People leave a mark on the world.

documentary history channel People leave a mark on the world. It might appear like a basic point, yet it regularly escapes us in the cutting edge world. When you read The New York Times, it doesn't appear that any individual can impact anything.

The Bible, obviously, instructs the inverse. In its recording of the colossal range of history throughout the centuries, it doesn't manage dynamic, unoriginal powers that push people into the side of the story. It portrays the lives of people solely. All the colossal occasions recorded in the Bible - the immense wars, the presentation of feudalism and government, the ascent and fall of domains - are just the background. They are not the principle story. The primary story is the general population, the people. The fundamental story is of the little pawns. The performing artists in the show are more than the dramatization itself.

Here's an illustration. We as a whole know the tale of Joseph and his siblings. Kin contention - the clinicians would have a field day. His siblings offer him into subjugation in Egypt, however later they come and bow down to him. That is the story the Bible lets us know.

I'll let you know how The New York Times would report it. "Feudalism Enters the World." "Egypt Becomes an Empire." "Awesome Famine Strikes the Fertile Crescent." "New Prime Minister of Egypt." Then they'd have a little life story of Joseph. The new head administrator originates from an obscure family. He was a slave who rose to control, a splendid translator of dreams. At that point, "Monotheism: The New Ideology," "Pioneer of Egypt Does Not Follow the Egyptian Gods." And then the siblings come: "New Immigrants Granted the Land of Goshen." And at long last, "Awesome Foreign Leader Dies and is Brought to Canaan for Burial." That's the manner by which The Times would compose it up.

In any case, the Bible doesn't recount the story that way. It recounts to you the tale of one individual, Joseph, who has a fantasy. God made a guarantee to his awesome granddad that He would send his relatives down into a remote land where they would be subjugated, and out of that land, they would approach and turn into an extraordinary people. So this young man has a fantasy and gets under the skin of his siblings. At that point they accomplish something that by and large wasn't right: they offer him into subjection in Egypt. That is the story. It begins with one individual.

So the Bible doesn't recount to us the stories of domains. It doesn't recount to us stories of monetary changes, of feudalism, of contrasts in government. The greater part of that is auxiliary. That is not history. History is the individual. What the individual does has the effect. On the off chance that the siblings wouldn't have sold Joseph, he couldn't have made Egypt so effective. In the event that Jacob had not sent him to discover his siblings, the entire thing wouldn't have happened. So all of history relies on upon what? On one individual and the seemingly insignificant details that transpire.

That is the Jewish perspective of history. What I do has any kind of effect. In the event that I give philanthropy today, it will have any kind of effect. So the following thing you do can choose the destiny of mankind. That gives a feeling of significance to life, isn't that right? All things considered, that is precisely what the Bible comes to let us know. In the amazing scope of history, individuals number.